Record set for World's Largest Fair Trade Coffee Break!

On May 10 2008, a grand total of 12,128 people in more than 150 locations from coast to coast in the USA convened to set the record for the World's Largest Fair Trade Coffee Break. An estimated 50,000 people participated in more than 200 events taking place throughout North America during Fair Trade Fortnight (May 3-18).

These World Fair Trade Day celebrations contributed to efforts in 70 countries worldwide marking the importance and benefits of Fair Trade. Together, Fair Trade Resource Network, Fair Trade Towns USA, and other leading Fair Trade organizations made WFTD 2008 the largest celebration in American history!

Thanks for all your great work making this the largest Fair Trade event in North American history. And here's to breaking the record next year. CHEERS!

BOGO LIGHT - Advertisement

Britons wasting £10 Billion worth of food a year, research says

by Michael Smith (Veshengro)

We’ve already heard lots about the food crisis that is threatening global development, and we have had plenty of debate about how eating no meat, a little meat, fake meat and even the plain old potato might help ease global hunger, stop global warming, and generally make life easier for all of us. But let’s forget about what we do eat for a moment – a new report coming out of the UK shows the staggering costs of what we don’t eat:

The British people are throwing away £10 billion worth of food that could be eaten each year, £2bn more than estimates have previously suggested, a government-funded programme to cut waste has revealed.

And that folks, is ten billion Pounds Sterling as in British billion and not US billion. In other words the calculation that someone made of this being equal to US$20 billion is off as the US has a different billion to the UK, so at least I have always understood that. Apparently the US billion is a thousand million and the other billion a million million.

The average household, ranging from a single older person to a group of students, is throwing out £420 of such food each year and the sum rises to £610 for the average family with children.

About £6bn of the wasted annual food budget is food that is bought but never touched - including 13m unopened yoghurt pots, 5,500 chickens and 440,000 ready meals dumped in home rubbish bins each day. The rest is food prepared or cooked for meals but never eaten because people have misjudged how much was needed and don't eat the leftovers.

Well, I guess I must be one of the odd ones out, as very little gets thrown out; at least not into the trash can. The important thing is to make sure that one;'s food is in date and rotate supplies, be those cans or other stuff.

Leftovers, if perfectly good, goes in the frigde and is used next day. Cans the contents of which has only been used half, say, also can be saved in that one uses food saver containers and, again, keeps the stuff in the fridge till the next day.

The problem is though that most people cannot cook from scratch anymore, at least not in this country, that is to say in Britain, and either entirely rely on ready to do meals or such. And even if they cook from scratch they just cannot think of what to do with leftovers. Children turn their noses up at something cooked from leftovers but there is nothing wrong with it and if the person doing the cooking has imagination and flair in cooking and often all that is needed is just a little then nice meals can be made from such leftovers.

The complete £10bn consists of food that could have been eaten, not including peeling and bones, the researchers say. Tackling the waste could mean a huge reduction in CO2 emissions, equivalent to taking one in five cars off the road.
The figures have been compiled by WRAP, the Waste and Resources Action Programme, which previously made the £8bn estimate and has warned we are throwing away a third of the food we buy, enough to fill Wembley stadium with food waste eight times over in a year.

Food waste has a significant environmental impact, and that not only from having to go somewhere. The research confirms that it is an issue for us all, whether as consumers, retailers, local or central government. This will, I believe, spark, and so it should, a major debate about the way food is packaged, sold, stored at home, cooked and then collected when it is thrown out.

While I have just mentioned the way food is packaged the food packaging here as waste, is and was not even the issue, but could also be mentioned when it comes to waste per se. That, however, could be another story all together.

What is most shocking here the most is the cost of our food waste at a time of rising food bills, and generally a tighter pull on our purse strings. It highlights that this is an economic and social issue as well as how much we understand the value of our food.

Consumers' wastefulness is costing them three times over. Not only do they pay hard-earned money for food they do not eat, there is also the cost of dealing with the waste this creates, and they pay for that through their council taxes and such. Then there are climate change costs to all of us of growing, processing, packaging, transporting, and refrigerating food that only ends up in the bin.

In addition to that there is the ethical bit, so to speak. We waste tons and tons of food daily while there are 1,000s upon 1,000s in this country and elsewhere in the developed world – I do not even want to mention the poor in the developing world, the are I still call Third World – who go hungry. I must say that I, like probably many of my generation, was raised with the adage of not wasting food, whether on the plate or elsewhere. Being of Romani-Gypsy stock may have something to do with that too as food was not always plenty.

When it comes to food waste though and it having to be dumped it is time to start thinking seriously about municipal composting programs like those in Mexico, Seattle and San Francisco, and on an individual level we can all take responsibility by biting off only what we can chew - check out some of the helpful tips on everything from portion sizing to storage to using left overs at Love Food Hate Waste, the campaign that commissioned the original report.

© M Smith (Veshengro), May 2008

Kantha Collection Released by Rising Tide Fair Trade

Unbeknown to, I am sure, many of us, Fair trade company, Rising Tide Fair Trade, introduces artisan-made kantha quilt bags to the U.S. with the debut of its Spring line, in NYC in Februart 2008.

Rising Tide Fair Trade (RTFT), distributors of fair trade fashion to the U.S.A., on the 20th February announced the release of its signature kantha collection – a limited edition line of carryall bags hand-crafted from vibrant vintage Indian quilts and cruelty-free dark brown suede.

Each bag is an original, designed exclusively for RTFT under the direction of company co-founders, Virginia Dooley and Nicole Jones. The cotton kantha textiles are sourced from a fair trade womens’cooperative in West Bengal, where the bags are all hand-crafted. Kantha artisans earn a living wage to support their families. RTFT individually chose each quilt for the collection from the cooperative’s wares.

The finished product, a combination of vibrantly colored floral and geometric patterns woven together with the finest kantha embroidery, embodies the adventurous spirit and stylish sensibility that puts Rising Tide at the forefront of the American fair trade marketplace.

“Nicole and I want fashionable women to realize the impact of the purchases they make. In the past, environmentally and socially conscious fashion meant traditional handicrafts, burlap and Birks. We created Rising Tide to help integrate fair trade fashion into the main stream, so modern women can embrace a people and planet friendly lifestyle and great style.”

Each kantha bags measures H 12” x W 20” x D 8”. Two 12” cruelty-free suede straps fit easily over the shoulder. The bags retails at $220.

Dooley and Jones plan to expand their line of limited edition bags by rolling out seasonal collections based on specialized textiles native to specific global regions. Plans for lines featuring fabrics of Uzbekistan, Cambodia, Senegal, and Bolivia are already in the works.

The Kantha collection is available on line at www.rtfairtrade.com.

In Bengal any garment or cloth with kantha embroidery, a running stitch which forms or outlines decorative motifs, is dubbed a kantha garment. Kantha is prevalent on saris in Bengal where women wrap themselves in decorative fabrics with its intricate embroidery. The stitching is also used in simple quilts for daily use. Women in Bengal often compile old saris and cloths and layer them with kantha stitch to make a light blanket or throw, especially for children. Also known as “rilli” (derived from the local word meaning to mix or connect) kantha quilts are often collected as a status of wealth and used for a daughter’s dowry.

Rising Tide Fair Trade was founded in 2004 by Virginia Dooley and Nicole Jones, two friends united by an obsession with exotic textiles and a belief that fashion and sustainability should go hand in hand.

Dooley and Jones realized their common interest while studying together in London, where they were inspired by the prevalence of fair trade goods in the U.K. and the lack of such products in the States. Determined to fill a hole they saw in the U.S. market and to disseminate fair trade labor practices to mainstream shoppers, the friends launched Rising Tide in June 2004. After testing a variety of clothing and accessories, Dooley and Jones decided to feature weekend bags as their signature item.

All Rising Tide bags are made with the highest quality craftsmanship and most eye-catching raw and recycled materials available from fair trade cooperatives across the globe. No two pieces are the same. Call or visit their website for more information, www.rtfairtrade.com

Bluetooth: A Danger to Privacy

Bluetooth leaves you open to intercept by anyone

by Michael Smith (Veshengro)

If you are concerned about your civil liberties and privacy then it may come as a shock to you to discover that you may have, unwittingly, been allowing your phone to signal your every move to the great wide world, including your communications.

Bluetooth, which is, as most will know, a wireless link built into many mobile telephones, makes our movements trackable by anyone equipped with a PC and an appropriate receiver. And this means ANYONE, not just the security services and the police, if that would not already be bad enough. Anyone, as the word says, can listen in and track where you are if they have the right equipment.

Vassilis Kostakos at the University of Bath in the UK placed four Bluetooth receivers in the city's centre. Over four months, his team tracked 10,000 Bluetooth phones and was able to "capture and analyse people's encounters" in pubs, streets and shops.

Bluetooth is now more of a privacy threat than the more frequently publicised RFID chips, Kostakos says. "If people are worried, they should turn off the Bluetooth function on their mobile phones."

Not everything, as we can, yet again see, that is supposedly good for us, is so.

“Oh, but without my 'Bluetooth' I cannot make phone calls on the move”, I hear some complain. “Can we not just make those things safer?”

Well, we probably could and could add encryption, if you, the consumer, is willing to pay the high costs then.

What is wrong with safely stopping your car, motorbike or your bicycle, to take or make that call? Also, no call is that important that it cannot wait until you get to a safe location where to return the call or make a call.

If you are concerned about your privacy, as said, turn the Bluetooth function off. While it may be something that can and does make life easier it also, yet again, is something that can be used to invade our privacy and to spy on us.

© M Smith (Veshengro), May 2008

Downsizing from Tractors to Camels

by Michael Smith (Veshengro)

The world is finally, even in the developing world, waking up; in Rajastan, India, at least.

There farmers are giving up on their gas- and diesel-guzzling tractors and are returning to using their trusty camels for haulage again, as they have done in times not so long ago.

Due to rising fuel prices farmers are rediscovering the "ships of the desert", and this is good too. Why they ever gave up the use of the camel for haulage is a question that can only be answered by them, but I would assume that they encountered the kind of salesman that can sell refrigerators and freezers to the Eskimos.

The price of a good camel has gone up sharply as a result: two years ago camels, good camels, were almost the same price as goats, now they are three times the price.

A good male camel will live for 60 to 80 years and costs about £500.00 while the cheapest tractor is £2,500.

This is good news according to the League for Pastoral Peoples and Endogenous Livestock Development because the camel population has been falling over the past ten years and this could lead to a revival of this age-old usage. So, let's hear it for the camel!

Camels have a long and regal history in India. They were, traditionally, used by Maharajahs and had great status and so did their breeders. Now decreasing amounts of grazing land and lack of investment in the existing lands have resulted in inadequate nutrition and lowered the resilience of the herds. Camel slaughter is forbidden in India but in fact sources believe that it is rampant, with the meat exported to Bangladesh. Not only is the use of camels being promoted but also its by-products such as camel milk, camel leather handbags and camel bone jewellery.

Well, this is in Rajastan, India. What about the Arab countries for camels and some of our countries, such as the USA, the UK, and countries in the EU for horses, mules and donkeys, once again?

The Amish in the USA still use the horse and many of their farms and businesses are, in their way, far more productive than many of the modern ones. In the UK in a number of areas the horse is making a comeback as a foresters timber moving animal and its use is beginning to spread. While a horse, alas, does not live as long as a camel, it nevertheless, I am sure, beats a tractor in acquisition and running costs.

Fair enough, you do not have the power of a tractor, but then you neither have the noise, the cost of fuel and maintenance – not that a horse may not need the vet or the farrier at times and neither of them are cheap – and neither the other associated problems you have with running a motor vehicle.

In Egypt and some other countries thereabouts the donkey is still in use as a means of haulage and in some of the new EU member states so is the horse, and not just by the Romani People in those countries. In Poland in the rural districts the horse and wagon are still a normal sight and they can even, at certain days, be found in the larger towns.

This might be something that we all should look at again. We also must not forget the ox and the bullock and others...

© M Smith (Veshengro), May 2008

British Police out of control?

British cops get away with murder – literally!

by Michael Smith (Veshengro)

First – well, was it the first one? – we have Jean Charles de Menezes in 2005, just after 7/7 and the other aborted attempt of suicide bombs in London some weeks later, who was gunned down by armed police officer of the anti-terrorist unit mistaken for a terrorist. The question here is as to whether that actually were cops and not SAS men. The entire operation had the signature of security services and SAS all over it.

And then we have had in 2006 the murder of the Nigerian businessman Frank Ogboru, 43, in London on holiday, who was sprayed with CS gas and pinned down after a minor row. Witnesses said officers had their "knees and feet'' on him as he "wailed like a dog".

But the CPS decided there was insufficient evidence" for any officers to be charged in connection with the death in Woolwich in 2006. What a surprise – NOT!

In both cases the cops got away scott free with killing someone. In the latter instance the CPS has decided NOT to press charged despite all the CCTV video and other evidence that clearly the police officers were extremely heavy handed and that their action directly contributed to the death of the person.

A pathologist even gave: “asphyxia during restraint" as the cause of death but the CPS decided "a jury would find that the restraint was not unlawful”. How come the CPS knows what or what not a jury would find unless the judge would, as is so often the case in court cases in this country, instruct the jury that they must find this way or that and cannot find any other way.

Then again, we all know that British Justice is the best that money can buy, if you have the money, that is.

Are cops in Britain now above the law?

Theoretically they are not and should not be but the more of this that we are seeing the more we must ask the question as to whether they – one – think that they are above the lay and – two – whether, somewhere along the line they are made more and more to be above the law.

I remember years ago already cops that we still rather wet behind the ears banding about comments like “I am the law”, also to yours truly, upon which I informed one officer of the truth with the comments “No, officer, you are NOT the law. You are but a law enforcement officer”. But the attitude was creeping in then in the late 1970's but it may have been there already, though I remember old officers who never seem to have had that attitude. Now, though, it would seem that even the highest officers have the attitude that they are above the law and, again and again, it seems to be borne out by the fact that no actions are taken even when it is truly murder or at least manslaughter.

Methinks it is high time that the law makers and the public, through their elected bodies and otherwise, put a stop to the abuse of power by the police. The abuse of power and powers that they do not have and should not have either. The actions during the Olympic torch relay in London as well showed this heavy-handedness that has become the common culture and currency in the police services across the UK, it would appear. Some of our police, and other agencies, are beginning to act like those agencies in countries with repressive regimes and which we, including our politicians – at times, rightly condemn. We have begun to head down a very slippery slope towards a police state. The surveillance state we already have and are, considering that the UK has more CCTV cameras per head of population than any other European country. Not something that we should be proud of, especially since it has made not one iota of a difference, a fact even admitted by police forces up and down the country, in fighting crime and deterring it. So much for the great hype.

Now the Independent Police Complaints Commission will decide on whether action should be taken in respect of the officers involved in the manslaughter or even murder of Frank Ogboru. The very same commission that basically found that no one was responsible for the murder of the Brazilian electrician at Stockwell Tube station. A whitewash and a farce is all that that is going to be, yet again. It is time, I should think, that one might examine actually as to how independent the Independent Police Complaints Commission actually is.

Many question, I think, but I doubt that we will ever get honest answers.

© M Smith (Veshengro), May 2008